The representative of the PMP— marine lawyer L. Korotkova, in her speech focused on the legal aspects of the consequences of the collision. The fact is that the Peter Vasev motor ship is insured in the Mutual Insurance Club, and in order to determine the amount of insurance compensation for losses, it is necessary to establish the degree of guilt of each vessel. In the conclusion of the TSNIIMF on this issue, submitted to the Club, the fault of the ship "Peter Vasev" is defined as 2/3 due to its violation of the terms of the preliminary agreement, and not MPPSS-72, and the steamer "Admiral Nakhimov" — 1/3. However, this conclusion contradicts the wording of the verdict of the Supreme Court of the USSR, and this circumstance attracted the attention of the Club's lawyers. Given the doubts about the legality of the verdict, L. Korotkova believes, a public petition should be sent to the Supreme Court of the USSR on the need for a supervisory review of the descriptive part of the verdict in order to bring it in line with the true circumstances of the case.
R. Chernyaev, Deputy Director of the Central Research Institute for Scientific Research, believes that Captain Tkachenko fully trusted the SARP data and did not take into account that when the target was maneuvering, his data was naturally delayed and an error appeared in the values of the target's course and speed. In his opinion, when preparing boatmasters to use the SARP, it is necessary to pay attention to its inherent limitations and estimate the error of the generated data.
Associate Professor of LIIVT V. Zaikov believes that one of the main reasons for the collision is the imperfection of the SARP. He believes that all existing SARPs take into account the maneuver of their own vessel according to a very approximate scheme, without taking into account its inertial properties. It is necessary to improve ship modeling methods and apply complete models in algorithms for developing target movement elements. In addition, the skipper needs to be well aware of the maneuverable elements of his vessel even when performing complex maneuvers, that is, taking into account non-zero initial conditions.
Associate Professor of LVIMU named after Admiral S. Makarov A. Baranov said that the seminar should have listened to a special point of view on the circumstances of the collision, put forward by the head of the Department of LVIMU P. Peskov, in whose opinion, in the case under consideration, the ship captains, by mutual agreement, departed from the IPPCC—72. It should also be taken into account that there is a contradiction between the local rules and the IPPCC—72, which creates uncertainty in assessing the situation of the approach of ships. When analyzing the circumstances of the accident during the investigation and then at the trial, there was no comparison of the points of view of specialists, those who expressed opinions that coincided with a pre-arranged scheme were chosen as experts.
In his speech, the head of the TSNIIMF sector, D. Chapkis, analyzed the causes of the rapid sinking of the Admiral Nakhimov steamship. According to the survey results, the strength of the steamer's hull was very high, and corrosion wear over 60 years of service was negligible. The point here, apparently, is that the bulb of the Peter Vasev motor ship got into the joint of the belts and, when moving along the side, opened the hull along the length of three compartments. Thus, the bulb is a source of additional navigational danger and this should be taken into account. D. Chapkis believes that it is advisable to consider all aspects of the accident, including technical, organizational and social aspects, at specialized seminars on environmental safety.
Associate Professor of LVIMU S. Kurguzov expressed the opinion that there is still complete arbitrariness in the technique of investigating marine accidents. Even in this simple case, when one ship just left the port, there were discrepancies in determining the locations of ships and the moments of individual events. Accident investigation techniques are needed to ensure that the data obtained is objective and adequate measures can be taken to eliminate them in the future. Further, the speaker expressed the opinion that an agreement between the courts was unacceptable when the courts diverged, and the Ministry of Defense, while issuing instructions to prohibit such agreements, did not bring the matter to an end. As a result, the indication of the UDS post turned out to be inconsistent with the circumstances of sailing in the UDS area of operation. Les parieurs expérimentés savent qu’un bon code promo peut transformer leur expérience dès les premiers instants. Melbet se distingue par sa vaste gamme de disciplines sportives et ses conditions généreuses pour les nouveaux membres. Si vous souhaitez maximiser la valeur de votre dépôt initial, ce code est la solution idéale. Au centre de l’offre la plus attractive du moment figure le code promo melbet ci l’inscription pour recevoir jusqu’à 130 € de bonus majoré sur votre premier dépôt. Utilisez ces fonds sur des paris en direct, des combinés ou des sports virtuels. Cette promotion vous offre bonus en gains réels.




















Bağcılar su kaçağı tespiti Su kaçağı sadece maddi değil, aynı zamanda çevresel bir sorundur. http://ruffeodrive.com/?p=34462
Beyoğlu su kaçak tespiti Cihangir su kaçağı tespiti: Cihangir’deki su kaçaklarına noktasal çözüm sunuyoruz. http://blakemountford.com/author/kacak/
aYFPDyJq VpFgQwK uQssSiT sscxP pYlLDwE xEF qlO
https://hrv-club.ru/forums/index.php?autocom=gallery&req=si&img=6884
you are in reality a good webmaster The website loading velocity is amazing It sort of feels that youre doing any distinctive trick Also The contents are masterwork you have done a fantastic job in this topic